Okay, a thought occurred to me while I was in the shower just now. Why, other than the assumption that the Bible is word for word fact, and human ego, does Creationism have to mean that evolutionary theory is false?
To make it clear why I'm dismissing the "Bible is word for word fact" issue, I will simply state that I have encountered enough evidence that satisfies my belief that the Bible has been edited and amended many times, and therefore even if it could have been at one point in time reality based truth, that it is nothing more than a manipulated and amended metaphor now. I do not have the evidence on hand to prove or disprove this, so for the sake of this entry, just pretend you agree with me, and if pressed, we can revisit this issue later.
The reason why I do not feel that creationism has to not include evolution is that I find it entirely possible that this higher power the creationists are always going on about could create this evolutionary mechanism, and simply seeded our planet with the starting blocks that lead to humanity and everything else on the planet. This would allow Him to sit back and watch his end goal develop over time. So, the only thing that tells me this can not be true is human ego.
Human ego feels that it is the most important thing ever, so in order to nurture that need to be the center of the universe, it claims that a higher power it believes to exist would create humanity directly in His own image. It's more of a challenge to create something, which turns into something else, which turns into something else, etc, which eventually turns into your end goal. So with all this evidence that evolution exists, why cling to the belief that it's wrong? Why not instead perhaps accept that God chose to go the more challenging route of starting the seeds of life upon our planet, then sitting back and watching them develop?
The excuses made in the Bible, as to why God doesn't directly punish us or manipulate our lives for being horrible sinners, is that He likes to sit back, watch us come to our own conclusions, and learn from our mistakes, instead of having our hand held every step of the way. So why can't this extend further? Why couldn't He have simply started the planet going, then sat back to watch and see if His programming of the seeds of life He left would lead to the end result we assume would be humanity? Even that assumption is egotistical of our species. It's entirely possibly this higher power started life rolling on our little planet for a different species entirely. Maybe He was seeking Dolphins, Mice, or even Mosquitoes?
At any rate, can anyone provide me with a reason that doesn't include Human ego, or some variation of "The Bible should be taken literally" to tell me why Creationism has to not include Evolutionary theory? Also, for the record, this entry is not a claim to agree with Creationism, but simply a random mental wandering wondering why the Creationists don't do the smart thing and justify proven scientific theory with their belief system, instead of simply fighting tooth and nail against it and making themselves look like stupid asses.